🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.